語篇對話性的理論及應用（簡體書）

從文學及社會批評理論汲取營養，借助語言學提供的微觀分析手段，整合出有效的分析框架并用以對非文學語篇進行批評性讀解，是批評性語篇分析的主流方法。該專著在對巴赫金超語言學理論進行系統闡述的基礎上，將其置于系統功能語言學理論視角之下進行重新語境化，提出了一個用于揭示語篇對話性的有效分析框架，并將該框架用于分析書面新聞語篇。分析與以虛構為主要特征的文學語篇相對的、以“事實性”與“客觀性”為基本訴求的新聞語篇，一來檢驗該分析框架的有效性和探索新聞語篇的本質特征，二來有助于從語篇層面上探討閱讀的認知機制。

李曙光，安徽安慶人。英語語言文學專業文學博士。現任南京師大外國語學院副教授、碩士生導師。獲南京師大第八屆青年教師教學大賽“教學十佳”稱號。研究方向為篇章語言學、句法學。發表論文十余篇，出版專著1部（第二作者）。代表作有《語篇對話性與英語書面新聞語篇分析》、《語篇分析中的互文性與對話性》和《POSS-ing結構的句法分析》。現主持江蘇高校社會科學基金項目1項，參與國家社會科學基金項目2項。

Introduction
Chapter 1 Bakhtin's Translinguistics
1.1 Bakhtin's understanding of language
1.1.1 Language, sign, consciousness and ideology
1.1.2 The object of language-study
1.2　Bakhtin's translinguistics
1.2.1 Discourse, text and utterance
1.2.2 Utterance, context and speech genres
1.3 Translinguistics and textual analysis
1.3.1Discourse, text and utterance in contemporary linguistics
1.3.2 Discourse, text and utterance in our discussion
1.3.3 Bakhtin's translinguistics and textual analysis
1.4 Summary

Chapter 2 The Compatibility between Translinguistics and Hallidayan SFL
2.1 Non-Aristotelian philosophical tradition
2.2　Translinguistics and SFL: context, function,register　and　genre
2.2.1 Context of situation: Bakhtin, Malinowski and　Halliday
2.2.2 Linguistic functions: Buhler, Bakhtin and_ Halliday
2.2.3 Register and genre: Bakhtin, Halliday and Martin
2.3 Instantiation and realization: SFL bridging translinguistics and linguistics
2.4 A double-oriented functional model of textual analysis
2.4.1A theory-driven top-down dialogic look at text
2.4.2 A data-driven bottom-up linguistic look at text
2.5 Summary

Chapter 3 Modeling Dialogicity on Hallidayan SFL
3.1 Bakhtin's idea of textual dialogicity
3.1.1 Dialogue, dialogicity and dialogism
3.1.2 The mode of dialogicity
3.1.3 Problems with Bakhtin's mode of textual dialogicity
3.2 Recontextualizing Bakhtinian dialogicity in the context of Hallidayan SFL and the postmodern theories
3.2.1From subject and utterance to voice: participant of textual dialogue
3.2.2 The dialogic relationship between voices
3.2.3 Dialogic markers in the text
3.2.4 Functions of dialogic relationships in the text
3.3 Summary

Chapter 4 Dialogic Markers in Print News of English
4.1 Voice, difference, and source in news text
4.2 Dialogic markers of speech reporting in news text
4.2.1 Speech reporting:a fundamental feature of human language
4.2.2 News text: report about others' words
4.2.3 Bakhtin's understanding of speech reporting
4.2.4 Dialogic markers in speech reporting
4.3 Modality as dialogic markers in news text
4.3.1　Modality and dialogicity
4.3.2 Modality resources as dialogic markers
4.4 Conjunction resources as dialogic markers in news text
4.5 Negatives as dialogic markers in news text
4.6 Summary

Chapter 5 Dialogic Interactions in Pdnt News of English
5.1 The dialogic relations in print news
……

Language is the greatest source of power because it resides in its organization as a huge network of interrelated paradigmatic choices; the system of language is thus this huge network of choices， theorized as　meaning potential.　
The complexity of language also lies in the fact that it is a layered system; the relationship between the different layers or strata is theorized as realization，. For instance， meanings are realized as wordings， and wordings realized as sound （ or soundings）The interstratal realization ensures the connection between the top order meaning system and the bot- tom order physical system. Among the strata of systems， the emergence of the stratum of lexicogrammar is crucial not only from a phylogenetic per- spective but also from an on，togenetic one（Halliday， 2002a：　355-60）. [2] It supplies the space in which meanings could be organized in their own terms. At this stratum， the syntagnlatic composition， which forms the ma- jor concern of Saussurean structure， is fundamental.
And the structure of clause rank is central because it cames the main burden of integrating the various kinds of meanings-that is， the selections in the various meaning systems-into a single frame. Thus， it can be accepted that the clause rank and its compositional structure' provide a point at which Halliday's system dovetails with Saussurean structural linguistics.　But it is necessary to note at this juncture that in Halliday's view， syntagmatic composition is the simplest and most accessible form of organization for any system whether material or semiotic， not just for the syntactic system.