Fear and Loathing in the Air

This thesis is about the Air Force's organizational response to acute combat fear and stress-past and present. Despite the practical experience of dealing with this issue from World War II to Vietnam, the Air Force's response has become muddled in recent years. Anecdotal evidence indicates that some airmen have proven unable or unwilling to do their duty in the air, but little data exists to corroborate the stories or record the response. In order to answer a series of related questions about the genesis and state of the Air Force's organizational response to acute combat fear and stress, I have broken this work into four parts: an examination of the related literature on combat stress; a review of the Air Force's actions in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam; a look at the actors and policies that form the contemporary organizational response; and a report on the formulation and results of the Combat Stress Survey-an instrument designed to provide contemporary data on the subject. This study demonstrates that the Air Force's organizational response to combat fear and stress has been a combination of medical and administrative policies designed to balance the needs of affected pilots with the war-fighting demands of the Air Force.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.